Friday, November 18, 2016 CLE

Mental Illness & Pharmacology

Cost:  $80  (Includes Disk of Materials)

Location:  302 W. Main Street, Durham, NC


8:00 – 8:40am         Registration
8:40 – 8:45am          Opening Remarks
8:45 – 10:15am         Session #1: Mental Health Diagnosis
.                                                   George Corvin, MD & Moira Artigues, MD
10:15 – 10:30am       Break
10:30 – 12:00pm      Session #2: Mental Health Diagnosis
                                                   Moira Artigues, MD & George Corvin, MD

12:00 – 1:15pm         Lunch (On Own)

1:15 – 2:25pm            Session #3: Mental Illness, Medications & the Brain
.                                                   Brian McMillian, PhD
2:25 – 3:00pm          Break
3:00 – 4:00pm          Session #4: Roundtable – Mental Illness and Substance Abuse
                                                   Drs. McMillian, Corvin & Artigues
4:00 – 4:30pm          Session #5: Representing Clients with Mental Illness
                                                    Elizabeth Hambourger


Program Registration              clementalillness-registration

Materials Only:

Costs (Includes S&H)        $25 Manual (Hard copy) or $10 Manual (Disk)

        $30 Manual (Hard copy & Disk)

Make Check Payable to:      David B. Botchin, 8 West Third St., Ste. 235, Winston-Salem, NC 27101


Our Mission

North Carolina Attorneys for Science and Technology (NCAST) is a nonprofit organization, consisting of a group of attorneys and scientists who are dedicated to educating legal professionals about forensic disciplines, reliable scientific methodology, and the perils of allowing junk science to play a role in our justice system.

Our Vision

In March 2010, Attorney General Roy Cooper ordered an forensic scienceaudit of the North Carolina State Bureau of Investigations Serology Lab after Gregory Taylor was exonerated by the  North Carolina Innocence Inquiry Commission. The audit revealed SBI analysts omitted, overstated, or falsely reported test results in 24.7% of blood-evidence cases. Many judges, lawyers, and jurors do not know the correct practice and limits of forensic science, and so they could not disregard the unreliable evidence revealed by the audit. Until our SBI uses rigorous science in its methods, and until our judges, lawyers, and jurors know and understand proper forensic evidence when they see it, justice and the innocent will continue to be lost.

Implementing and strengthening scientific procedures that produce valid forensic evidence will substantially increase the truth-seeking quality of our courts. Confidence in our courts, in particular the criminal courts, will be restored when lawyers are able to make informed decisions about scientific forensic evidence and judges can exercise their gate-keeping function, admitting scientific forensic evidence and excluding junk science.